Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Br J Haematol ; 202(1): 31-39, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2306618

RESUMEN

As the COVID-19 variant Omicron surge in Beijing, China, a better understanding of risk factors for adverse outcomes may improve clinical management in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) diagnosed with COVID-19. The study sample includes 412 cases, mainly represented by acute leukaemia, chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), plasma cell disorders and lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. COVID-19 pneumonia was observed in 10.4% (43/412) of patients, and severe/critical illness was observed in 5.3% (22/412). Among the 86 cases with advanced malignancies, 17.6% (12/86) of patients developed severe/critical COVID-19, which was significantly higher than reported in patients with stable malignancies (9/326, 2.70%, p < 0.001). Similarly, the advanced malignancy cohort had a higher mortality rate (9/86, 10.5% vs. 0/326, 0%, p < 0.001) and a poor 30-day overall survival (OS) compared with the stable malignancy cohort (74.2% vs. 100.0%, p < 0.0001). Overall, nine patients (2.2%) died. The primary cause of death was progressive HM in four patients and a combination of both COVID-19 and HM in five patients. In the multivariable analysis, over 65 years of age, comorbidities and advanced malignancy were correlated with severe/critical COVID-19 in HM patients. This study sheds light on the poor outcomes among COVID-19 HM patients with the leading cause of advanced malignancy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/complicaciones , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/epidemiología
2.
Br J Haematol ; 201(4): 640-644, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286731

RESUMEN

Haematology patients contracting SARS-CoV-2 were identified at the start of the pandemic to be at higher risk of death or of persistent symptoms (post-COVID-19 syndrome). As variants with altered pathogenicity have emerged, uncertainty remains around how that risk has changed. We prospectively set up a dedicated post-COVID-19 clinic to monitor haematology patients infected with COVID-19 from the start of the pandemic. In total, 128 patients were identified and telephone interviews were conducted with 94 of 95 survivors. Ninety-day mortality attributed to COVID-19 has fallen sequentially from 42% for the Original and Alpha strains to 9% and to 2% for the Delta and Omicron variants respectively. Furthermore, the risk of post-COVID-19 syndrome in survivors has fallen from 46% for the Original or Alpha strains to 35% for Delta and 14% for the Omicron strain. Since vaccine uptake has been nearly universal in haematology patients, it is not possible to determine whether improved outcomes reflect the reduced pathogenicity of the virus, or widespread vaccine deployment. Whilst mortality and morbidity remain higher in haematology patients than in the general population, our data suggest that the absolute risks are now significantly lower. Given this trend, we believe clinicians should initiate conversations about risk with their patients on whether to maintain any self-imposed social isolation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hematología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19
3.
Eur J Cancer ; 181: 102-118, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2230357

RESUMEN

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Patients with cancer have been identified as a high-risk population for severe infections, rendering prophylaxis and treatment strategies for these patients particularly important. Rapidly evolving clinical research, resulting in the recent advent of various vaccines and therapeutic agents against COVID-19, offers new options to improve care and protection of cancer patients. However, ongoing epidemiological changes and rise of new virus variants require repeated revisions and adaptations of prophylaxis and treatment strategies to meet these new challenges. Therefore, this guideline provides an update on evidence-based recommendations with regard to vaccination, pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 in cancer patients in light of the currently dominant omicron variants. It was developed by an expert panel of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) based on a critical review of the most recent available data.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/complicaciones , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunación
4.
Intern Med J ; 2022 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2136892

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in patients with haematological neoplasms has been associated with increased mortality; however, many studies in this patient group were reported early in the pandemic. The authors evaluated outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients with haematological conditions following widespread vaccination, newer viral variants and increasingly effective antiviral therapies. A 4% mortality rate was found and contemporary risk factors for hospitalisation including older age, nonvaccination or partial COVID-19 vaccination status and infection with non-Omicron strain were identified.

5.
Clin Infect Pract ; 16: 100210, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2130411

RESUMEN

Background: Most patients with SARS-CoV-2 are non-infectious within 2 weeks, though viral RNA may remain detectable for weeks. However there are reports of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, with viable virus and ongoing infectivity months after initial detection. Beyond individuals, viral evolution during persistent infections may be accelerated, driving emergence of mutations associated with viral variants of concern. These patients often do not meet inclusion criteria for clinical trials, meaning clinical and virologic characteristics, and optimal management strategies are poorly evidence-based. Methods: We analysed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection from a regional testing laboratory in South-West England between March 2020 and December 2021, with at least two SARS-CoV-2 positive samples separated by ≥ 56 days were identified. Excluding those with confirmed or likely re-infection, we identified patients with persistent infection, characterised by an ongoing clinical syndrome consistent with COVID-19 alongside monophyletic viral lineage of SARS-CoV-2. We examined clinical and virologic characteristics, treatment, and outcome. We further performed a literature review investigating cases of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, reviewing patient characteristics and treatment. Results: We identified six patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. All were hypogammaglobulinaemic and had underlying haematological malignancy, with four having received B-cell depleting therapy. Evidence of viral evolution, including accrual of mutations associated with variants of concern, was demonstrated in five cases. Four patients ultimately cleared SARS-CoV-2. In two patients, clearance followed treatment with casirivimab/imdevimab. Both survived beyond thirty days following viral clearance, having experienced infections of 305- and 269-days duration respectively, after failed attempts at clearance with alternative therapies. We found 60 cases of confirmed persistent infection in the literature, with a further 31 probable cases. Of those, 80% of patients treated with monoclonal antibodies cleared SARS-CoV-2, and none died. Conclusion: Haematological malignancy and patients receiving B-cell depleting therapies represent key groups at risk of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Throughout persistent infection, SARS-CoV-2 can evolve rapidly, giving rise to significant mutations, including those implicated in variants of concern. Monoclonal antibodies appear to be a promising therapeutic option, potentially in combination with antivirals, crucial for individuals, and for public health.

6.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(22)2022 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2109949

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with simultaneous diagnosis of haematological malignancies (HM) and COVID-19 is unknown and there are no specific treatment guidelines. METHODS: We describe the clinical features and outcome of a cohort of 450 patients with simultaneous diagnosis of HM and COVID-19 registered in the EPICOVIDEHA registry between March 2020 to February 2022. RESULTS: Acute leukaemia and lymphoma were the most frequent HM (35.8% and 35.1%, respectively). Overall, 343 (76.2%) patients received treatment for HM, which was delayed for longer than one month since diagnosis in 57 (16.6%). An overall response rate was observed in 140 (40.8%) patients after the first line of treatment. After a median follow-up of 35 days, overall mortality was 177/450 (39.3%); 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients not receiving HM treatment (42.1%) than in those receiving treatment (27.4%, p = 0.004), either before and/or after COVID-19, or compared to patients receiving HM treatment at least after COVID-19 (15.2%, p < 0.001). Age, severe/critical COVID-19, ≥2 comorbidities, and lack of HM treatment were independent risk factors for mortality, whereas a lymphocyte count >500/mcl at COVID-19 onset was protective. CONCLUSIONS: HM treatment should be delivered as soon as possible for patients with simultaneous diagnosis of COVID-19 and HM requiring immediate therapy.

7.
Life (Basel) ; 12(8)2022 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1969351

RESUMEN

Vaccination is an important tool in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with haematologic malignancies. The paper provides an analysis of the course of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in a group of vaccinated patients with haematological malignancy and a comparison with a historical cohort of 96 non-vaccinated patients with haematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes (two patients) in the treatment of COVID-19. A severe or critical course of COVID-19 was significantly less frequent in the group of vaccinated patients (10.2% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.003). The need for hospitalisation due to COVID-19 was significantly lower in vaccinated patients (27.1% vs. 72.6%, p < 0.0001) and the duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter (10 vs. 14 days, p = 0.045). Vaccinated patients were insignificantly less likely to require oxygen therapy during infection. COVID-19 mortality was significantly higher in non-vaccinated patients (15.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.047). The paper demonstrated a significant positive effect of vaccination against COVID-19 on a less severe clinical course of infection, lower need for hospitalisation and mortality. However, the results need to be evaluated even in the context of new antivirals and monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 or virus mutations with different biological behaviour.

8.
Intern Med J ; 51 Suppl 7: 143-176, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1961593

RESUMEN

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) in haematology/oncology patients presents as primary infection or breakthrough infection, which can become refractory to antifungal treatment and has a high associated mortality. Other emerging patient risk groups include patients in the intensive care setting with severe respiratory viral infections, including COVID-19. These guidelines present key diagnostic and treatment recommendations in light of advances in knowledge since the previous guidelines in 2014. Culture and histological-based methods remain central to the diagnosis of IA. There is increasing evidence for the utility of non-culture methods employing fungal biomarkers in pre-emptive screening for infection, as well as for IA diagnosis when used in combination. Although azole resistance appears to be uncommon in Australia, susceptibility testing of clinical Aspergillus fumigatus complex isolates is recommended. Voriconazole remains the preferred first-line antifungal agent for treating primary IA, including for extrapulmonary disease. Recommendations for paediatric treatment broadly follow those for adults. For breakthrough and refractory IA, a change in class of antifungal agent is strongly recommended, and agents under clinical trial may need to be considered. Newer immunological-based imaging modalities warrant further study, while surveillance for IA and antifungal resistance remain essential to informing the relevance of current treatment recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Aspergilosis , COVID-19 , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspergillus fumigatus , Niño , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico
9.
J Crit Care ; 71: 154109, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1936751

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Critical Care Outreach Teams (CCOTs) have been associated with improved outcomes in patients with haematological malignancy (HM). This study aims to describe CCOT activation by patients with HM before and during the Covid-19 pandemic, assess amny association with worse outcomes, and examine the psychological impact on the CCOT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, mixed-methods analysis was performed in HM patients reviewed by the CCOT over a two-year period, 01 July 2019 to 31 May 2021. RESULTS: The CCOT increased in size during the surge period and reviewed 238 HM patients, less than in the pre- and post-surge periods. ICU admission in the baseline, surge and the non-surge periods were 41.7%, 10.4% and 47.9% respectively. ICU mortality was 22.5%, 0% and 21.7% for the same times. Time to review was significantly decreased (p = 0.012). Semi-structured interviews revealed four themes of psychological distress: 1) time-critical work; 2) non-evidence based therapies; 3) feelings of guilt; 4) increased decision-making responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increase in total hospital referrals, the number of patients with HM that were reviewed during the surge periods decreased, as did their ICU admission rate and mortality. The quality of care provided was not impaired, as reflected by the number of patients receiving bedside reviews and the shorter-than-pre-pandemic response time.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Infection ; 50(5): 1373-1382, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1920272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated clinical features and risk factors for mortality in patients with haematological malignancies and COVID-19. METHODS: Retrospective, case-control (1:3) study in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Cases were patients with haematological malignancies and COVID-19, controls had COVID-19 without haematological malignancies. Patients were matched for sex, age and time of hospitalization. RESULTS: Overall, 66 cases and 198 controls were included in the study. Cases had higher prior corticosteroid use, infection rates, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia and more likely received corticosteroids and antibiotics than controls. Cases had higher respiratory deterioration than controls (78.7% vs 65.5%, p = 0.04). Notably, 29% of cases developed respiratory worsening > 10 days after hospital admission, compared to only 5% in controls. Intensive Care Unit admission and mortality were higher in cases than in controls (27% vs 8%, p = 0.002, and 35% vs 10%, p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, having haematological malignancy [OR4.76, p < 0.001], chronic corticosteroid therapy [OR3.65, p = 0.004], prior infections [OR57.7, p = 0.006], thrombocytopenia [OR3.03, p < 0.001] and neutropenia [OR31.1, p = 0.001], low albumin levels [OR3.1, p = 0.001] and ≥ 10 days from hospital admission to respiratory worsening [OR3.3, p = 0.002] were independently associated with mortality. In cases, neutropenia [OR3.1, p < 0.001], prior infections [OR7.7, p < 0.001], ≥ 10 days to respiratory worsening [OR4.1, p < 0.001], multiple myeloma [OR1.5, p = 0.044], the variation of the CT lung score during hospitalization [OR2.6, p = 0.006] and active treatment [OR 4.4, p < 0.001] all were associated with a worse outcome. CONCLUSION: An underlying haematological malignancy was associated with a worse clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients. A prolonged clinical monitoring is needed, since respiratory worsening may occur later during hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neutropenia , Trombocitopenia , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Albúminas , Antibacterianos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Humanos , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombocitopenia/complicaciones
11.
New Microbiol ; 45(1):62-72, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | PubMed | ID: covidwho-1782123

RESUMEN

Convalescent plasma (CP) therapy might be effective in patients with haematological malignanciesand B-cell depletion. We report a single-centre experience of COVID-19 patients with non-Hodgkinlymphoma and absence of B-cells as a consequence of anti-CD20 therapy successfully treated withCP from October 2020 to May 2021. CP was given in the presence of pneumonia with respiratoryfailure despite standard treatment and consisted of three infusions on an alternate-day basis. A reviewof the current literature on this topic was also performed. Six patients were identified (medianage 59.5 years (range 50-73)). The last anti-CD20 drug administration occurred 60 days before infection(range 0-360). CP was administered after a median of 51 days (range 9-120) from SARS-CoV-2diagnosis, with an early improvement in all but one subject. We suggest a possible clinical benefitof convalescent CP treatment in COVID-19 patients with haematological malignancies and B-celldepletion having persistent/recurrent pneumonia.

12.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 207(1): 3-10, 2022 01 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1621554

RESUMEN

B-cell-depleting agents are among the most commonly used drugs to treat haemato-oncological and autoimmune diseases. They rapidly induce a state of peripheral B-cell aplasia with the potential to interfere with nascent vaccine responses, particularly to novel antigens. We have examined the relationship between B-cell reconstitution and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in two cohorts of patients previously exposed to B-cell-depleting agents: a cohort of patients treated for haematological B-cell malignancy and another treated for rheumatological disease. B-cell depletion severely impairs vaccine responsiveness in the first 6 months after administration: SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence was 42.2% and 33.3% in the haemato-oncological patients and rheumatology patients, respectively and 22.7% in patients vaccinated while actively receiving anti-lymphoma chemotherapy. After the first 6 months, vaccine responsiveness significantly improved during early B-cell reconstitution; however, the kinetics of reconstitution was significantly faster in haemato-oncology patients. The AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and the Pfizer BioNTech 162b vaccine induced equivalent vaccine responses; however, shorter intervals between vaccine doses (<1 m) improved the magnitude of the antibody response in haeamto-oncology patients. In a subgroup of haemato-oncology patients, with historic exposure to B-cell-depleting agents (>36 m previously), vaccine non-responsiveness was independent of peripheral B-cell reconstitution. The findings have important implications for primary vaccination and booster vaccination strategies in individuals clinically vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humanos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
13.
Br J Haematol ; 190(1): e1-e3, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1388215
14.
Eur J Cancer ; 147: 154-160, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1077873

RESUMEN

The worldwide spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated infectious coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed a unique challenge to medical staff, patients and their families. Patients with cancer, particularly those with haematologic malignancies, have been identified to be at high risk to develop severe COVID-19. Since publication of our previous guideline on evidence-based management of COVID-19 in patients with cancer, research efforts have continued and new relevant data has come to light, maybe most importantly in the field of vaccination studies. Therefore, an update of our guideline on several clinically important topics is warranted. Here, we provide a concise update of evidence-based recommendations for rapid diagnostics, viral shedding, vaccination and therapy of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. This guideline update was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology by critically reviewing the currently available data on these topics applying evidence-based medicine criteria.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/normas , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Neoplasias , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Esparcimiento de Virus/fisiología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virología , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/virología , Hematología/organización & administración , Hematología/normas , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva/métodos , Inmunización Pasiva/normas , Infectología/organización & administración , Infectología/normas , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/normas , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/virología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/normas , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
15.
Eur J Cancer ; 140: 86-104, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-778791

RESUMEN

Since its first detection in China in late 2019 the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 continue to have a major impact on global healthcare and clinical practice. Cancer patients, in particular those with haematological malignancies, seem to be at an increased risk for a severe course of infection. Deliberations to avoid or defer potentially immunosuppressive therapies in these patients need to be balanced against the overarching goal of providing optimal antineoplastic treatment. This poses a unique challenge to treating physicians. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding prevention, diagnostics and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 as well as strategies towards safe antineoplastic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) by critically reviewing the currently available data on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in cancer patients applying evidence-based medicine criteria.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Atención a la Salud/normas , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pronóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas
16.
Eur J Haematol ; 105(4): 476-483, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-599960

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterise the outcomes of patients with haematological malignancy and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in hospital in our regional network of 7 hospitals. METHODS: Consecutive hospitalised patients with haematological malignancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified from 01/03/2020 to 06/05/2020. Outcomes were categorised as death, resolved or ongoing. The primary outcome was preliminary case fatality rate (pCFR), defined as the number of cases resulting in death as a proportion of all diagnosed cases. Analysis was primarily descriptive. RESULTS: 66 Patients were included, overall pCFR was 51.5%. Patients ≥ 70 years accounted for the majority of hospitalised cases (42, 63%) and fatalities (25, 74%). Mortality was similar between females (52%) and males (51%). Immunosuppressive or cytotoxic treatment within 3 months of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a significantly higher pCFR of 70%, compared with 28% in those not on active treatment (P = .0013, 2 proportions z test). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates in patients with haematological malignancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital are high supporting measures to minimise the risk of infection in this population.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Citotoxinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Hospitalización , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA